Trump teki sitten diilin Iranin kanssa, jossa Iran sai kaiken mitä halusi, Yhdysvallat ja länsi ei saanut mitään. Viski-Pete selitti pressissä ummet ja lammet jotain olematonta saissea, että miten Iran rukoili rauhaa ja jenkit on voittaneet sodan. Mikä ei voisi siis olla kauempana totuudesta. Jopa tyhmimmätkin MAGA-hatut on kyseenalaistaneet koko Trumpin hallinnon sanomiset Iraniin liittyen. 70 yritysvaikuttajaa vaatii Trumpin siirtämistä virasta. Eikä vielä ole edes päästy Epstein-keississä eteenpäin.
Uutiset:
Aihe: Donalt Trump (Luettu 84811 kertaa)
Teroterava
- Sr. Member
-
- Viestejä: 1086
Rakastajien aatelia
-
Valkoinen talo: Trump aikoo puhua Rutten kanssa Natosta vetäytymisestä.
https://www.hs.fi/maailma/art-2000011909452.html
Luuleeko se, että NATO:sta lähteminen onnistuu vain pelkällä ilmoituksella? Ja minkä ihmeen takia NATO:n pitäisi hyökätä ylipäätään mihinkään? Tai avustaa Israelia ja Yhdysvaltoja tekemissään sotarikoksissa. '
WH pressi:
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Leavitt: "Thanks to the unmatched excellence of our warriors at the direction of the commander in chief, the world has just witnessed a historically swift and successful military triumph"
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Leavitt: "Iran has agreed to open the Strait of Hormuz"
(Fox News just reported Iran is closing the strait!)
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Q: What is the president's message to the American people as to what was achieved through Operation Epic Fury?
LEAVITT: The imminent threat posed by Iran has now been greatly destroyed
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
NBC: Iranian state media says Iran has now closed the Strait of Hormuz today. What's the White House response?
LEAVITT: The president was made aware of those reports before I came to the podium. That is completely unacceptable
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
NBC: The president yesterday threatened a 'whole civilization would die.' Why is it appropriate for the president to use that kind of language when talking about civilian targets?
LEAVITT: I understand the questions about the president's rhetoric, but what the president cares most about is results
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
NBC: Should the world not take the president's world seriously?
LEAVITT: The world should take his world very seriously and understand that the president is always most interested in results. It was the Iranians who backed down, not President Trump
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Leavitt announces that Trump is "dispatching his negotiating team led by the vice president, JD Vance, special envoy Witkoff, and Mr. Kushner to Islamabad for talks this weekend"
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
FEINBERG: How can the president claim America can ever high the moral high ground if he's threatening to destroy civilizations?
LEAVITT: Take a look at the actions of this president. For you to even suggest he doesn't have moral high ground over the Iranian terrorist regime is frankly insulting
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Q: Does the president believe the US should earn revenue from the Strait of Hormuz?
LEAVITT: It's an idea the president has floated
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Q: As of today, who controls the Strait of Hormuz?
LEAVITT: We expect that the strait will be opened immediately
Q: Who controls the strait right now?
LEAVITT: *refuses to answer*
Lainaus
Sotilasliitto Naton tukea testattiin Iranin sodassa, ja Nato epäonnistui, Valkoisen talon lehdistösihteeri Karoline Leavitt sanoi toimittajille tiedotustilaisuudessa uutistoimisto Reutersin mukaan.
Nato "käänsi selkänsä Yhdysvalloille".
Presidentti Donald Trump ja Naton pääsihteeri Mark Rutte tapaavat tänään Washingtonissa. Leavittin mukaan Trump aikoo puhua Rutten kanssa jopa mahdollisuudesta, että Yhdysvallat vetäytyy Natosta.
Trump on useasti sodan aikana ilmaissut pettymyksensä siihen, että muut Nato-maat eivät ole osallistuneet Yhdysvaltain hyökkäykseen Iraniin.
https://www.hs.fi/maailma/art-2000011909452.html
Luuleeko se, että NATO:sta lähteminen onnistuu vain pelkällä ilmoituksella? Ja minkä ihmeen takia NATO:n pitäisi hyökätä ylipäätään mihinkään? Tai avustaa Israelia ja Yhdysvaltoja tekemissään sotarikoksissa. '
WH pressi:
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Leavitt: "Thanks to the unmatched excellence of our warriors at the direction of the commander in chief, the world has just witnessed a historically swift and successful military triumph"
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Leavitt: "Iran has agreed to open the Strait of Hormuz"
(Fox News just reported Iran is closing the strait!)
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Q: What is the president's message to the American people as to what was achieved through Operation Epic Fury?
LEAVITT: The imminent threat posed by Iran has now been greatly destroyed
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
NBC: Iranian state media says Iran has now closed the Strait of Hormuz today. What's the White House response?
LEAVITT: The president was made aware of those reports before I came to the podium. That is completely unacceptable
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
NBC: The president yesterday threatened a 'whole civilization would die.' Why is it appropriate for the president to use that kind of language when talking about civilian targets?
LEAVITT: I understand the questions about the president's rhetoric, but what the president cares most about is results
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
NBC: Should the world not take the president's world seriously?
LEAVITT: The world should take his world very seriously and understand that the president is always most interested in results. It was the Iranians who backed down, not President Trump
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Leavitt announces that Trump is "dispatching his negotiating team led by the vice president, JD Vance, special envoy Witkoff, and Mr. Kushner to Islamabad for talks this weekend"
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
FEINBERG: How can the president claim America can ever high the moral high ground if he's threatening to destroy civilizations?
LEAVITT: Take a look at the actions of this president. For you to even suggest he doesn't have moral high ground over the Iranian terrorist regime is frankly insulting
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Q: Does the president believe the US should earn revenue from the Strait of Hormuz?
LEAVITT: It's an idea the president has floated
Aaron Rupar @atrupar.com wrote:
Q: As of today, who controls the Strait of Hormuz?
LEAVITT: We expect that the strait will be opened immediately
Q: Who controls the strait right now?
LEAVITT: *refuses to answer*